Results of Experiments

We show the results of our experiments in Table 2. The table shows that forward decoding is superior to Viterbi decoding for the word accuracy rate. However, it is inferior for the word correct rate. These results mean that forward decoding has fewer insertion errors than Viterbi decoding.

表 2: Experimental results

Forward decoding	text-open	text-closed
word correct	34.0%	36.3%
word accuracy	25.9%	29.0%
Viterbi decoding	text-open	text-closed
word correct	54.1%	56.8%
word accuracy	20.1%	23.6%